Sustainable Metropolis World Trade Center Live@Metropolis Next Generation Designmart Events tropgreen

Have we forgotten how to dream?


Editor In Chief


In the weeks before the first anniversary of 9/11, film crews from all over the world were roaming the city, looking for human-interest stories to send back home. Reporters from TV stations in Holland, Belgium, England, and Asia arrived at Metropolis, setting up their lights and cameras between the piles of papers and books in my office. The first question they all asked, without fail, was "Where is the vision for rebuilding?" This was in response to the six plans for the World Trade Center site released, to widespread disgust, by the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (LMDC) this summer.

I wanted to tell them that the vision was about to be born, that it was just taking a bit longer because we were still in mourning, numbed by the emotional aftershocks of the towers' collapse. I wanted to say, "Just watch us--brave and spunky and creative New Yorkers that we are--we will have a grand vision to truly represent that shiny twenty-first century city you're all expecting from us." But would this simply be wishful thinking on my part?

The people in charge of rebuilding seem to be more comfortable with mediocrity and with pleasing financiers than with searching for a vision. And the people who are not in charge have all the ideas but none of the finances. Will there ever come a time when it will be possible to bring the two together for the benefit of our city?

Alexandros Washburn, the young architect who used to head up the Pennsylvania Station Redevelopment Corporation, was putting together the Ground Zero Lab at New York University's School of Continuing Education and Professional Studies this summer. He saw this project as multidisciplinary, open to students and professionals in the humanities and computer sciences as well as designers and architects. The course, he said, would be an "opportunity to answer one basic question: What do we want our city to become? It is a question of culture and humanity, yet its realization lies within the powers of policy and finance." If Alex thought he could bring culture and finance and humanity together, what stops the men of the LMDC from doing the same?

Then there's Eli Attia, an architect whose frustration with the LMDC was so great that he created a public forum on his own. In early August, Attia posted an online petition (at www.phoenixUSA.org) that pleads: "We ask that the government of the United States, the government of the State of New York, the government of the state of New Jersey, and the government of the City of New York act immediately to conduct an architectural and design competition for the design of Ground Zero in its entirety." From the first eleven signatures, which included those of our own publisher Horace Havemeyer III and architect Peter Eisenman, the signatures grew in number steadily; by August's end 10,411 people from all walks of life, including many architects and designers, signed their names. One of them, Diana Griffith, from Michigan, begged the power elite not to "allow something as important as this to become a bureaucratic mess. We must have a design that is truly a masterpiece; the vision of one mind, not a committee."

The people in power may comfortably ignore the work of a bright young teacher and his students. But can they ignore something bigger than they are--the voices of the people, now coming from many different directions, all talking about the same thing--the vision thing?


BACK TO TOPBACK TO TOP