<\/div>\n\n\n\n
The volume is organized around nine principles that integrate urban design and architecture to create affordable dwellings. The firm also works for market-rate clients, but the same principles apply. Baker figured out that the firm\u2019s clients for social housing were committed to building excellence because they held onto their properties, rather than sell them. The idea of \u201cbaking the design in\u201d is similar to LMSA\u2019s, but the results are dramatically different. This is the joy of having both volumes published at the same time. Baker\u2019s volume is not a legacy for the future as much as a textbook for the present. The intended audience includes students, community members, housing advocates, architects, and urban designers. His quirky humor shows throughout. For example, there is a small photo with the caption \u2026maneki-neko<\/em> lucky cat figurines oversee all design work at the San Francisco office.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\nDBA worked with San Francisco modernist graphic designer Jeremy Mende for the monograph. Both firms chose the designer that I thought the other would choose. You could say Venezky\u2019s design loosened up the tight vocabulary of LMSA and Mende brought order to Baker\u2019s bold moves. Both practices benefited from not choosing the obvious route.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Baker then tapped two of his younger principals to prepare the introduction and design editor Allison Arieff<\/a> to write the foreword. As she points out in her essay, the firm is writing a story with each building. But unlike many of the urban designers and architects of the 20th century, they do not impose form on clients but create places from a multitude of sensitive and thoughtful strategies focused on people.<\/p>\n\n\n\nBoth volumes are worth exploring for anybody interested in how architecture can actually help a local community as well as the planet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n